Could a referendum be forced upon us?

a 2nd referendum is insulting to the 17 million leavers We need to just leave now and remove May’s Government and keep out the odious Corbyn led Labour Party

If the remainders would have won as predicted by the same margin, we certainly would have had a case to fight for as David Cameron spent 9 million of our money in sending out leaflets for us to remain. A bias act indeed. Well pointed out by Sammy Wilson that we have already been given a vote on alternative voting. The government have been well and truly caught out in their own craftiness.

Our Westminster parliament is based on the people vote their representative to Parliament, as their MP, and if not satisfied in his/her performance can get rid of that person, and replace by someone else.

If that representative is continually calling for a referendum, they are throwing the responsibility given to them by the people, back to the people, and undermine the very reason why they were elected in the first place.

Our Westminster MP’s should get on with their job, which sadly many have forgotten what it is.

You don’t have to be a genius to work out that Greenings proposed referendum is designed to split the Leaver vote, not the Tories.
We’ve already made the decision to leave the EU and no deal is better than a bad deal, remember?

That’s exactly right, Steven, and exactly planned that way by the likes of Justine Greening. She knows, as do they all, that three-way votes produce mathematical certainties if you control the questions. It’s a cynical, divide-and-conquer calculation. Contrary to Brian Mooney’s assertion, it isn’t a “complicated referendum” at all. Whenever you’ve got a relatively narrow margin (e.g. 52 : 48) between two factions, you retain the choice of the faction you favour (in this case the Remainers), and give the other faction (in this case the Leavers) a ‘generous’ two new choices, having eliminated their original choice. It’s clever, because “leave with no deal” sounds the same as “leave the EU” two years ago, but she knows it’s different and divisive. Greening’s ‘solution’ guarantees remaining in the EU, because almost any splitting of the Leavers into two camps automatically creates a minority position for them.

A second referendum NO WAY
That would make a mockery of the democratic process
The next project fear campaign is under way in all the Global Corporate owned and sold out press and media and that includes the BBC and like the first, the UK voters will not be conned and it will fail.

You can guarantee that what the EU favours most is worst for the UK and what the EU wants least is best for us

So for me its better to have no deal than a bad deal. I’m sure I’ve heard a leading politician say that before -May be not!
For me a clean Exit and the EU protectionist racket will take its chances and crumble
The EU is not Europe

Reply to Greenings ”Fixed Vote”

2 Questions in 3rd Referendum since 1975 (Heath illegally taking UK in January 1973)

1. UK To leave EU & its Institutions Immediately

2.UK To leave Now WTO rules immediately No £40billion ‘Divorce bill’.

Despite that recent poll, I think most people do not desire another referendum. Indeed, many cannot believe that we are not out of the EU already. We desperately need to move on from the divisions of the last referendum and leave behind the labels of “Brexiteers” and “Remainers.” Greening’s model would divide the country yet further by introducing a third group into the fray; it would also be deeply undemocratic to seek to reverse the referendum two years on when it took Brexiteers forty-three years took reverse the 1973 referendum. It would show where the Establishment’s heart lies and would continue the pattern of European rejection of democracy that we have seen in France and Ireland. The Europhile elite have openly declared Brexit voters to be ignorant and stupid and they continue this line of thought by thinking no one would notice their blatant attempt to split the Leave camp. The result would probably be along the lines of 40% for No-Deal, 15% for the Chequers hash, and 45% for Remain. It would be a bitter betrayal of the people.

Greening is an Arch-Remainer and her proposal reflects that fact. A total non-starter from the moment she proposed it. There won’t be another referendum on leaving nor on a deal for leaving. May & Co should just get on with following our Referendum instruction.

I simply do not understand how a simply ‘In or Out’ referendum as proposed and adopted run by David Cameron et al can be misconstrued as being anything else. It was exactly what it said on the ballot paper. Anything else is a ‘cop out’.

britishconstitutiongroup.com